Pentium N3510 vs Celeron J1850

CPU

GPU

Pentium N3510

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Celeron J1850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Pentium N3510

4 / 4

1,040

+0.5%

1,035

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3510 is positioned at rank 1180 and the Celeron J1850 is on rank 110, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3510

#1168

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4542%

#1169

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4475%

#1170

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

4108%

#1171

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

4090%

#1172

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

4052%

#1174

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3913%

#1175

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3752%

#1176

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3746%

#1177

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3646%

#1180

Pentium N3510

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

100%

#1181

Core i7-7Y75

MSRP: $393|Avg: $285

100%

#1183

Core i7-4500U

MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A

97%

#1185

Athlon Neo X2 L325

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

95%

#1186

Core i3-2370M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

94%

#1187

Core i3-3217UE

MSRP: $225|Avg: $35

94%

#1188

Celeron T3000

MSRP: $150|Avg: $54

93%

#1189

Core m7-6Y75

MSRP: $393|Avg: $393

93%

#1190

Core M-5Y10

MSRP: $281|Avg: $20

91%

#1193

Celeron 900

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

87%

#1194

Pentium T3400

MSRP: $150|Avg: $90

87%

#1195

Core 2 Solo SU3500

MSRP: $262|Avg: $15

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850

#31

Ryzen 5 230

MSRP: $200|Avg: $190

98%

#98

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

283%

#99

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

279%

#100

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

256%

#101

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

255%

#102

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

253%

#104

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

244%

#105

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

234%

#106

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

234%

#107

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

228%

#110

Celeron J1850

MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A

100%

#114

Core i3-4100M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $99

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Pentium N3510 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.

Insight	Pentium N3510	Celeron J1850
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($161)	✅ More affordable ($82)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron J1850 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $82 (vs $161), it costs 49% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 95% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium N3510.

Insight	Pentium N3510	Celeron J1850
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+95%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($161)	✅ More affordable ($82)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium N3510 Benchmark Check

Celeron J1850 Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3510 and Celeron J1850

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium N3510 and Celeron J1850 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium N3510 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J1850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3510 scores 1,040 against the Celeron J1850's 1,035 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium N3510 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850.

Feature	Pentium N3510	Celeron J1850
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,040	1,035
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Pentium N3510	Celeron J1850
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N3510) / VT-x (Celeron J1850). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.