Pentium N3540
VS
Turion 64 ML-28

Pentium N3540 vs Turion 64 ML-28

Intel

Pentium N3540

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3540 is positioned at rank 1149 and the Turion 64 ML-28 is on rank 556, so the Turion 64 ML-28 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3540

#1137
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3912%
#1138
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3855%
#1139
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3539%
#1140
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3523%
#1141
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3490%
#1143
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3371%
#1144
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3232%
#1145
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3227%
#1146
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3140%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
98%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
96%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
95%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-28

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
98%
#544
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
733%
#545
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
722%
#546
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
663%
#547
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
660%
#548
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
654%
#550
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
632%
#551
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
606%
#552
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
605%
#553
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
588%
#556
Turion 64 ML-28
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium N3540 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3L-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium N3540Turion 64 ML-28
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 ML-28 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium N3540Turion 64 ML-28
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3540 and Turion 64 ML-28

Intel

Pentium N3540

The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.

AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3540 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 49.8% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540. The Pentium N3540 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3540 scores 1,207 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N3540. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

FeaturePentium N3540Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+300%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+66%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
22 nm-76%
90 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,207
1,201
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3540 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3540Turion 64 ML-28
Socket
FCBGA1170
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0