Pentium N3540 vs Turion 64 ML-28

Pentium N3540 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

Pentium N3540

4 / 4

1,207

+0.5%

Celeron 1047UE

Celeron 877

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,201

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium N3540 vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium N3540 vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium N3540

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-28 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,201 vs 1,207).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3540 better than Turion 64 ML-28?

Yes. Pentium N3540 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium N3540 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3540 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3540 is the better buy right now. Pentium N3540 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3540 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium N3540 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium N3540

The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium N3540 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 49.8% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540. The Pentium N3540 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3540 scores 1,207 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N3540. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

Feature	Pentium N3540	Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.66 GHz+66%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,207	1,201

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3540 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.