Celeron J3355
VS
Pentium N3540

Celeron J3355 vs Pentium N3540

Intel

Celeron J3355

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Pentium N3540

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J3355 is positioned at rank 425 and the Pentium N3540 is on rank 1149, so the Celeron J3355 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3355

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6218%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5876%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4266%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1285%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1018%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
891%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
503%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
458%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
458%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
453%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
441%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
435%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
433%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
429%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
98%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
98%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
97%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#425
Celeron J3355
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
100%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
99%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
96%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3540

#1137
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3912%
#1138
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3855%
#1139
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3539%
#1140
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3523%
#1141
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3490%
#1143
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3371%
#1144
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3232%
#1145
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3227%
#1146
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3140%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
98%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
96%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
95%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium N3540 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J3355 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron J3355Pentium N3540
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J3355Pentium N3540
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3355 and Pentium N3540

Intel

Celeron J3355

The Celeron J3355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,203 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium N3540

The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.

Processing Power

The Celeron J3355 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3540 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J3355 versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The Celeron J3355 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium N3540 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3355 scores 1,203 against the Pentium N3540's 1,207 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium N3540. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3355 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540.

FeatureCeleron J3355Pentium N3540
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.66 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.16 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,203
1,207
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3355 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium N3540 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron J3355Pentium N3540
Socket
FCBGA1296
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3355) / not specified (Pentium N3540). The Celeron J3355 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium N3540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3355 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3355 rivals Pentium J4205.

FeatureCeleron J3355Pentium N3540
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power