Celeron J3355 vs Phenom X3 8450e

Celeron J3355 vs Phenom X3 8450e Performance Spectrum

Celeron J3355

2 / 2

1,203

0.0%

Atom E3827

Celeron 877

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,206

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3355 vs Phenom X3 8450e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3355 vs Phenom X3 8450e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3355

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Phenom X3 8450e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,203 vs 1,206).

Phenom X3 8450e

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3355 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3355 better than Phenom X3 8450e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J3355 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X3 8450e pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X3 8450e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3355 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J3355 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3355 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3355 vs Phenom X3 8450e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3355

The Celeron J3355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,203 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom X3 8450e

The Phenom X3 8450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,206 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3355 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8450e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8450e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J3355 versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X3 8450e — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J3355. The Celeron J3355 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X3 8450e uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3355 scores 1,203 against the Phenom X3 8450e's 1,206 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom X3 8450e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3355 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8450e.

Feature	Celeron J3355	Phenom X3 8450e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,203	1,206
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3355 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8450e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J3355	Phenom X3 8450e
Socket	FCBGA1296	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3355) / not specified (Phenom X3 8450e). The Celeron J3355 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Phenom X3 8450e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3355 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3355 rivals Pentium J4205.