Celeron J3355
VS
Pentium 997

Celeron J3355 vs Pentium 997

Intel

Celeron J3355

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Pentium 997

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J3355 is positioned at rank 425 and the Pentium 997 is on rank 1104, so the Celeron J3355 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3355

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6218%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5876%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4266%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1285%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1018%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
891%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
503%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
458%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
458%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
453%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
441%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
435%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
433%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
429%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
98%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
98%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
97%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#425
Celeron J3355
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
100%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
99%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
96%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 997

#1092
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3235%
#1093
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3187%
#1094
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2926%
#1095
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2913%
#1096
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2886%
#1098
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2787%
#1099
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2673%
#1100
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2668%
#1101
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2596%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
99%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
97%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
96%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
95%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
95%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron J3355 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 997 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron J3355Pentium 997
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J3355Pentium 997
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3355 and Pentium 997

Intel

Celeron J3355

The Celeron J3355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,203 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium 997

The Pentium 997 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,215 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J3355 and Pentium 997 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J3355 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium 997 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J3355 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron J3355 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 997 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3355 scores 1,203 against the Pentium 997's 1,215 — a 1% lead for the Pentium 997. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3355 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 997.

FeatureCeleron J3355Pentium 997
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+56%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,203
1,215
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3355 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 997 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron J3355Pentium 997
Socket
FCBGA1296
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3355) / not specified (Pentium 997). The Celeron J3355 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium 997 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3355 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3355 rivals Pentium J4205.

FeatureCeleron J3355Pentium 997
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power