Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition vs Xeon E5-2418L

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition vs Xeon E5-2418L Performance Spectrum

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition

4 / 4

3,489

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2418L

4 / 8

3,518

+0.8%

Core i7-3689Y

Pentium Gold 5405U

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition vs Xeon E5-2418L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition vs Xeon E5-2418L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2418L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,489 vs 3,518).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2418L, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌150% higher power demand at 125W vs 50W.

Xeon E5-2418L

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 50W instead of 125W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2418L better than Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2418L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2418L is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2418L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2418L still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2418L comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2418L makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition vs Xeon E5-2418L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition

The Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,489 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2418L

The Xeon E5-2418L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,518 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2418L's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2418L — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2418L. The Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5-2418L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition scores 3,489 against the Xeon E5-2418L's 3,518 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2418L. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2418L.

Feature	Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition	Xeon E5-2418L
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	10240 kB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Deneb (2009−2011)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	3,489	3,518

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II 42 TWKR Black Edition uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2418L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.