Phenom X4 9450e
VS
Celeron N2810

Phenom X4 9450e vs Celeron N2810

AMD

Phenom X4 9450e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron N2810

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9450e is positioned at rank 1093 and the Celeron N2810 is on rank 605, so the Celeron N2810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9450e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
96506%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
91189%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
66211%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19946%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15800%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13822%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7916%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7813%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
7114%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
7113%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
7034%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6844%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6748%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6721%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6660%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
100%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
96%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
93%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
88%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
81%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
73%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
71%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
70%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
67%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
65%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
61%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
59%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
58%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
57%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
55%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2810

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#593
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
796%
#594
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
785%
#595
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
720%
#596
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
717%
#597
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
710%
#599
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
686%
#600
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
658%
#601
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
657%
#602
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
639%
#605
Celeron N2810
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom X4 9450e leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N2810 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom X4 9450eCeleron N2810
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($430)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom X4 9450eCeleron N2810
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($430)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9450e and Celeron N2810

AMD

Phenom X4 9450e

The Phenom X4 9450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9450e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N2810 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9450e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X4 9450e versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9450e. The Phenom X4 9450e uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N2810 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9450e scores 1,455 against the Celeron N2810's 1,474 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron N2810. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9450e vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2810.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCeleron N2810
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,455
1,474+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9450e uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2810 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCeleron N2810
Socket
AM2+
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9450e) / true (Celeron N2810). The Celeron N2810 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Phenom X4 9450e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCeleron N2810
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true