Phenom X4 9450e
VS
Core i7-620LM

Phenom X4 9450e vs Core i7-620LM

AMD

Phenom X4 9450e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9450e is positioned at rank 1093 and the Core i7-620LM is on rank 1208, so the Phenom X4 9450e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9450e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
96506%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
91189%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
66211%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19946%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15800%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13822%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7916%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7813%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
7114%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
7113%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
7034%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6844%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6748%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6721%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6660%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
100%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
96%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
93%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
88%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
81%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
73%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
71%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
70%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
67%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
65%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
61%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
59%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
58%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
57%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
55%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620LM

#1196
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6012%
#1197
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5924%
#1198
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5439%
#1199
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5414%
#1200
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5364%
#1202
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5180%
#1203
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4967%
#1204
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4959%
#1205
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4826%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
100%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
95%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
85%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-620LM delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Phenom X4 9450e in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPhenom X4 9450eCore i7-620LM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($430)
More affordable ($300)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-620LM stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 30% cheaper ($300 vs $430) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPhenom X4 9450eCore i7-620LM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+44%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($430)
More affordable ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9450e and Core i7-620LM

AMD

Phenom X4 9450e

The Phenom X4 9450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9450e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-620LM offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9450e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X4 9450e versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM. The Phenom X4 9450e uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-620LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9450e scores 1,455 against the Core i7-620LM's 1,463 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-620LM. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9450e vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCore i7-620LM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,455
1,463
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9450e uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-620LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCore i7-620LM
Socket
AM2+
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9450e) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom X4 9450e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCore i7-620LM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Phenom X4 9450e launched at $450 MSRP, while the Core i7-620LM debuted at $300.

FeaturePhenom X4 9450eCore i7-620LM
MSRP
$450
$300-33%
Avg Price (30d)
$430
Release Date
2008
2010