Phenom X4 9500 vs Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Phenom X4 9500
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9500 is positioned at rank 1061 and the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is on rank 1091, so the Phenom X4 9500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9500
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom X4 9500 | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($78) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom X4 9500 | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+157%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($78) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Phenom X4 9500
The Phenom X4 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
The Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Phenom X4 9500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9500 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+. The Phenom X4 9500 uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9500 scores 1,564 against the Athlon 64 X2 5400+'s 1,585 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9500 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9500 | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-28% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Agena (2007−2008) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,564 | 1,585+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom X4 9500 uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9500 | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2+ | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Value Analysis
The Phenom X4 9500 launched at $247 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ debuted at $485. At current prices ($30 vs $78), the Phenom X4 9500 is $48 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom X4 9500 delivers 52.1 pts/$ vs 20.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ — making the Phenom X4 9500 the 87.8% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9500 | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $247-49% | $485 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-62% | $78 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.1+157% | 20.3 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+
