Phenom X4 9600B vs Atom C3508
Phenom X4 9600B
Atom C3508
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9600B is positioned at rank 1055 and the Atom C3508 is on rank 409, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9600B
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom X4 9600B | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom X4 9600B | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9600B and Atom C3508
Phenom X4 9600B
The Phenom X4 9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $149.
Atom C3508
The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Phenom X4 9600B and Atom C3508 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9600B versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9600B. The Phenom X4 9600B uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom C3508 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9600B scores 1,842 against the Atom C3508's 1,831 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom X4 9600B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9600B vs 8 MB on the Atom C3508.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9600B | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz+44% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 8 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Agena (2007−2008) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 1,842 | 1,831 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom X4 9600B uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3508 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9600B versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 — the Atom C3508 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Phenom X4 9600B) vs 12 (Atom C3508) — the Atom C3508 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9600B | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2+ | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-1066 | DDR4-1866+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 256 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom X4 9600B) / not specified (Atom C3508). Primary use case: Phenom X4 9600B targets Business.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9600B | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Business | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom X4 9600B and Atom C3508
