Phenom X4 9600B
VS
Core Duo T2700

Phenom X4 9600B vs Core Duo T2700

AMD

Phenom X4 9600B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2700

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9600B is positioned at rank 1055 and the Core Duo T2700 is on rank 1233, so the Phenom X4 9600B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9600B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
47016%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
44425%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
32256%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9717%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7697%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6734%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3857%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3806%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3466%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3465%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3427%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3334%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3288%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3274%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3245%
#1054
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
100%
#1056
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
99%
#1057
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
98%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
97%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1060
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
95%
#1061
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
91%
#1062
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
91%
#1063
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
89%
#1064
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
88%
#1065
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
88%
#1066
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
87%
#1067
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
86%
#1068
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
85%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2700

#1221
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
10441%
#1222
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
10288%
#1223
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
9445%
#1224
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
9402%
#1225
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
9316%
#1227
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
8996%
#1228
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
8626%
#1229
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
8612%
#1230
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
8381%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
100%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
84%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
76%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
74%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
72%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
65%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Duo T2700 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Phenom X4 9600B in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPhenom X4 9600BCore Duo T2700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($663)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Phenom X4 9600B holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $20 (vs $663), it costs 97% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 3183% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core Duo T2700.
InsightPhenom X4 9600BCore Duo T2700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3183%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($663)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9600B and Core Duo T2700

AMD

Phenom X4 9600B

The Phenom X4 9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core Duo T2700

The Core Duo T2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,860 points. Launch price was $663.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9600B versus 2.33 GHz on the Core Duo T2700 — a 1.3% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2700. The Phenom X4 9600B uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core Duo T2700 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9600B scores 1,842 against the Core Duo T2700's 1,860 — a 1% lead for the Core Duo T2700. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9600B vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2700.

FeaturePhenom X4 9600BCore Duo T2700
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.33 GHz+1%
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,842
1,860
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9600B uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-1066 memory speed. The Phenom X4 9600B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeaturePhenom X4 9600BCore Duo T2700
Socket
AM2+
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-1066
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Phenom X4 9600B) vs VT-x (Core Duo T2700). Primary use case: Phenom X4 9600B targets Business, Core Duo T2700 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2700 rivals Core 2 Duo T5600.

FeaturePhenom X4 9600BCore Duo T2700
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Business
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Phenom X4 9600B launched at $278 MSRP, while the Core Duo T2700 debuted at $663.

FeaturePhenom X4 9600BCore Duo T2700
MSRP
$278-58%
$663
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Release Date
2008
2006