Pro A12-8800B vs Xeon E5-2403 v2

AMD

Pro A12-8800B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2403 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Pro A12-8800B vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pro A12-8800B vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pro A12-8800B vs Xeon E5-2403 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pro A12-8800B

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Xeon E5-2403 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,672).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • Costs $208 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 108.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Pro A12-8800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A12-8800B better than Xeon E5-2403 v2?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pro A12-8800B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2403 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pro A12-8800B is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2403 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Pro A12-8800B comes in 108.3% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2403 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2403 v2 is also 108.7% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pro A12-8800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pro A12-8800B vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Pro A12-8800B

The Pro A12-8800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

Processing Power

Both the Pro A12-8800B and Xeon E5-2403 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Pro A12-8800B versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — a 61.5% clock advantage for the Pro A12-8800B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Pro A12-8800B uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pro A12-8800B scores 2,667 against the Xeon E5-2403 v2's 2,672 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2403 v2.

FeaturePro A12-8800BXeon E5-2403 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+89%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+17%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,667
2,672
Geekbench 6 Single
528
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,144
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pro A12-8800B uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the Pro A12-8800B versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — the Pro A12-8800B supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2403 v2 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Pro A12-8800B) vs 3 (Xeon E5-2403 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Pro A12-8800B) vs 24 (Xeon E5-2403 v2) — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePro A12-8800BXeon E5-2403 v2
Socket
FP4
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133+60%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
384 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Pro A12-8800B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2). The Pro A12-8800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server.

FeaturePro A12-8800BXeon E5-2403 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pro A12-8800B was priced at $400, while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 came in at $192. On launch pricing ($400 vs $192), Xeon E5-2403 v2 was $208 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pro A12-8800B delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — making the Xeon E5-2403 v2 the 70.4% better value option.

FeaturePro A12-8800BXeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP
$400
$192-52%
Performance per Dollar
6.7
13.9+107%
Release Date
2015
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.