Celeron G5900 vs Pro A12-8800B

CPU

GPU

Celeron G5900

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2020

Buy on Amazon

Pro A12-8800B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G5900 vs Pro A12-8800B Performance Spectrum

Celeron G5900

2 / 2

2,682

+0.6%

2,667

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Pro A12-8800B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Pro A12-8800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅+61% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 704.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.6 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2800% higher power demand at 58W vs 2W.

Pro A12-8800B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 58W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (528 vs 850).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,144 vs 1,600).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900 better than Pro A12-8800B?

Yes. Celeron G5900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data, 39.9% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 39.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900 comes in $350 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 704.5% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5900 vs Pro A12-8800B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Pro A12-8800B

The Pro A12-8800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pro A12-8800B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A12-8800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3.4 GHz on the Pro A12-8800B — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pro A12-8800B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Pro A12-8800B's 2,667 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G5900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 528, a 46.7% lead for the Celeron G5900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,600 vs 1,144 (33.2% advantage for the Celeron G5900).

Feature	Celeron G5900	Pro A12-8800B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,682	2,667
Geekbench 6 Single	850+61%	528
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600+40%	1,144

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A12-8800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus DDR3-2133 on the Pro A12-8800B — the Celeron G5900 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and Socket FP4 (Pro A12-8800B).

Feature	Celeron G5900	Pro A12-8800B
Socket	LGA1200	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+25%	DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs AMD-V (Pro A12-8800B). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5900) and Radeon R7 Graphics (Pro A12-8800B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Pro A12-8800B
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5900 was priced at $50, while the Pro A12-8800B came in at $400. On launch pricing ($50 vs $400), Celeron G5900 was $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900 delivers 53.6 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Pro A12-8800B — making the Celeron G5900 the 155.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Pro A12-8800B
MSRP	$50-88%	$400
Performance per Dollar	53.6+700%	6.7
Release Date	2020	2015

Search Celeron G5900 on Amazon

Search Pro A12-8800B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.