PRO A12-9800
VS
Core i7-2710QE

PRO A12-9800 vs Core i7-2710QE

AMD

PRO A12-9800

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-2710QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A12-9800 is positioned at rank 282 and the Core i7-2710QE is on rank 1084, so the PRO A12-9800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A12-9800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4155%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3926%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2851%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
859%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
680%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
595%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
341%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
336%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
306%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
306%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
303%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
295%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
291%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
289%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
287%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
100%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
99%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
99%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
99%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
98%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
98%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
98%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
97%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
97%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
96%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
96%
#282
PRO A12-9800
MSRP: $110|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2710QE

#1072
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2958%
#1073
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2914%
#1074
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2675%
#1075
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2663%
#1076
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2639%
#1078
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2548%
#1079
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2444%
#1080
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2440%
#1081
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2374%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
97%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
96%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
94%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The PRO A12-9800 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2710QE in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPRO A12-9800Core i7-2710QE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i7-2710QE holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $40 (vs $55), it costs 27% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 37% higher cost efficiency score compared to the PRO A12-9800.
InsightPRO A12-9800Core i7-2710QE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+37%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of PRO A12-9800 and Core i7-2710QE

AMD

PRO A12-9800

The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2710QE

The Core i7-2710QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,749 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The PRO A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2710QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2710QE — a 33.3% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The PRO A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2710QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A12-9800 scores 3,751 against the Core i7-2710QE's 3,749 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A12-9800.

FeaturePRO A12-9800Core i7-2710QE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+40%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+81%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,751
3,749
Geekbench 6 Single
604
🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2710QE uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePRO A12-9800Core i7-2710QE
Socket
AM4
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (PRO A12-9800) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2710QE). The Core i7-2710QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A12-9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2710QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2710QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeaturePRO A12-9800Core i7-2710QE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded/Industrial
💰

Value Analysis

The PRO A12-9800 launched at $110 MSRP, while the Core i7-2710QE debuted at $378. At current prices ($55 vs $40), the Core i7-2710QE is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the PRO A12-9800 delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 93.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-2710QE — making the Core i7-2710QE the 31.5% better value option.

FeaturePRO A12-9800Core i7-2710QE
MSRP
$110-71%
$378
Avg Price (30d)
$55
$40-27%
Performance per Dollar
68.2
93.7+37%
Release Date
2016
2011