
PRO A12-9800

Ryzen Embedded R1505G
PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
PRO A12-9800
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,751 vs 3,799).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.1 vs 47.5 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Embedded R1505G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.5 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded R1505G better than PRO A12-9800?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A12-9800
The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen Embedded R1505G
The Ryzen Embedded R1505G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,799 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The PRO A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 versus 3.3 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1505G — a 24% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The PRO A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A12-9800 scores 3,751 against the Ryzen Embedded R1505G's 3,799 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1505G.
| Feature | PRO A12-9800 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+27% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,751 | 3,799+1% |
Memory & Platform
The PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | PRO A12-9800 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (PRO A12-9800) / AMD-V (Ryzen Embedded R1505G). The Ryzen Embedded R1505G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the PRO A12-9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Embedded R1505G targets Embedded.
| Feature | PRO A12-9800 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the PRO A12-9800 was priced at $110, while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G came in at $80. On launch pricing ($110 vs $80), Ryzen Embedded R1505G was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the PRO A12-9800 delivers 34.1 pts/$ vs 47.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R1505G — making the Ryzen Embedded R1505G the 32.8% better value option.
| Feature | PRO A12-9800 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110 | $80-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.1 | 47.5+39% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














