Pentium G4620 vs PRO A12-9800

Pentium G4620 vs PRO A12-9800 Performance Spectrum

Pentium G4620

2 / 4

3,761

+0.3%

3,751

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G4620 vs PRO A12-9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G4620 vs PRO A12-9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G4620

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.7 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅Draws 51W instead of 65W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

PRO A12-9800

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,751 vs 3,761).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.1 vs 43.7 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌27.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4620 better than PRO A12-9800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A12-9800 is ahead with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4620 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G4620 is the better buy right now. Pentium G4620 comes in $24 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $110 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that PRO A12-9800 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.2% better value on MSRP (43.7 vs 34.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, PRO A12-9800 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium G4620 vs PRO A12-9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G4620

The Pentium G4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,761 points. Launch price was $100.

PRO A12-9800

The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G4620 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A12-9800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Pentium G4620 versus 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Pentium G4620 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A12-9800 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G4620 scores 3,761 against the PRO A12-9800's 3,751 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G4620.

Feature	Pentium G4620	PRO A12-9800
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,761	3,751

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G4620 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-9800 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G4620	PRO A12-9800
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium G4620 was priced at $86, while the PRO A12-9800 came in at $110. On launch pricing ($86 vs $110), Pentium G4620 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G4620 delivers 43.7 pts/$ vs 34.1 pts/$ for the PRO A12-9800 — making the Pentium G4620 the 24.8% better value option.

Feature	Pentium G4620	PRO A12-9800
MSRP	$86-22%	$110
Performance per Dollar	43.7+28%	34.1
Release Date	2017	2016

Search Pentium G4620 on Amazon

Search PRO A12-9800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.