Pentium G4620 vs Xeon E5-1607

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G4620 vs Xeon E5-1607 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G4620 vs Xeon E5-1607: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G4620

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 130W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1607 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,761 vs 3,788).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1607, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1607 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1607

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌154.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1607 better than Pentium G4620?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium G4620 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1607 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1607 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-1607 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4620 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (43.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G4620 vs Xeon E5-1607 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G4620

The Pentium G4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,761 points. Launch price was $100.

Xeon E5-1607

The Xeon E5-1607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 3,788 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G4620 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-1607 has 2 more cores. The Pentium G4620 is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium G4620 scores 3,761 against the Xeon E5-1607's 3,788 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-1607. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4620 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607.

Feature	Pentium G4620	Xeon E5-1607
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	10 MB+233%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	3,761	3,788

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G4620 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.