Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs RADEON 9800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs RADEON 9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs RADEON 9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

✅785.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2027.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9800

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8850 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
59.6% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 785.7% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1232.8% in PassMark G3D (773 vs 58), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2027.1% (3.1 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9800 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs RADEON 9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A10-8850 scores 773 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the Radeon R7 A10-8850 leads by 1232.8%. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score	773+1233%	58
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	512	2560+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8192 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+1713%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	160+400%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 carries 128 MB. Radeon R7 A10-8850 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 draws 55W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	RADEON 9800
TDP	55W	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Perf/Watt	14.1+1182%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A10-8850 came in at $250, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A10-8850 was 37.3% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the Radeon R7 A10-8850 offers 3000% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	RADEON 9800
MSRP	$250-37%	$399
Performance per Dollar	3.1+3000%	0.1
Codename	Cape Verde	Strix Halo
Release	July 6 2016	January 6 2025
Ranking	#667	#98

Search Radeon R7 A10-8850 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.