GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON 9800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON 9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON 9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200M G

2014

Why buy it

✅+12.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 55W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

RADEON 9800

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (58 vs 65).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8200M G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.1% in PassMark G3D (65 vs 58), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 8200M G still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON 9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200M G

The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8200M G scores 65 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the GeForce 8200M G leads by 12.1%. The GeForce 8200M G is built on Maxwell while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8200M G) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score	65+12%	58
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+1620%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	2900 MHz+158%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	16	160+900%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8200M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8200M G has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 carries 128 MB. GeForce 8200M G gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200M G and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200M G draws 33W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200M G) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	RADEON 9800
TDP	33W-40%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.0+82%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200M G came in at $0, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 8200M G was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the GeForce 8200M G offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 (2025 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	RADEON 9800
MSRP	$0-100%	$399
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.1
Codename	GM108	Strix Halo
Release	March 12 2014	January 6 2025
Ranking	#854	#98

Search GeForce 8200M G on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.