Radeon 2100 vs RADEON 9800
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank 725 and the RADEON 9800 is on rank 740, so the Radeon 2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9800 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RADEON 9800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon 2100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $399 for the RADEON 9800, it costs 88% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 742.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+742.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($399) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and RADEON 9800
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
RADEON 9800
The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 2100 scores 60 and the RADEON 9800 reaches 58 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60+3% | 58 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+1788% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 2900 MHz+183% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 8 MB+6054% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 has 128 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 8 MB+6054% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399 and now averages $399. The Radeon 2100 costs 87.7% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the Radeon 2100 offers 1100% better value. The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-88% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2+1100% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Strix Halo |
| Release | May 13 2019 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #898 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 2100 and RADEON 9800
