Radeon 2100 vs RADEON X800 PRO
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank 725 and the RADEON X800 PRO is on rank 371, so the RADEON X800 PRO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 PRO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon 2100, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 253.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+253.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and RADEON X800 PRO
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
RADEON X800 PRO
The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 65 — the RADEON X800 PRO leads by 8.3%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON X800 PRO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60 | 65+8% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3840+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+1956% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 2105 MHz+106% |
| ROPs | 8 | 96+1100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 240+900% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 768 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 4 MB+2977% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 PRO has 256 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 4 MB+2977% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (RADEON X800 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2+300% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399 and now averages $15. The RADEON X800 PRO costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs 4.3 (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO offers 258.3% better value. The RADEON X800 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 4.3+258% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #898 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 2100 and RADEON X800 PRO
