Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1550

AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Radeon X1550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon X1550 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon X1550

2017

Why buy it

  • 94.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1550 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 94.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 11.7% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 60), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 2100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon X1550 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

AMD

Radeon X1550

The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the Radeon X1550's 67 — the Radeon X1550 leads by 11.7%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon X1550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 512 (Radeon X1550). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
G3D Mark Score
60
67+12%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1183 MHz+16%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 2100 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1550. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 2100) vs 256 KB (Radeon X1550) — the Radeon X1550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
DirectX
9.0b
9_0c
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs Avivo (Radeon X1550). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
Encoder
Avivo
Avivo
Decoder
Avivo
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon X1550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (Radeon X1550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
1.2
1.3+8%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 2100 came in at $149, while the Radeon X1550 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1550 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 2100) vs Infinity (Radeon X1550) — the Radeon X1550 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1550
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
Infinity
Codename
Polaris 24
Lexa
Release
May 13 2019
April 20 2017
Ranking
#898
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.