Radeon 2100 vs RADEON X600 PRO

AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X600 PRO

2020Core: 1130 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON X600 PRO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON X600 PRO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 50.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

RADEON X600 PRO

2020

Why buy it

  • 100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Radeon 2100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X600 PRO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 11.7% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 60), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X600 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X600 PRO makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 68.1% (0.7 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

AMD

RADEON X600 PRO

The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the RADEON X600 PRO leads by 11.7%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
G3D Mark Score
60
67+12%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
6.39 TFLOPS+713%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1560 MHz+52%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
3 MB+2208%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 2100 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
3 MB+2208%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: Avivo vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
Encoder
Avivo
None
Decoder
Avivo
MPEG-2
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
170mm
Height
65mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
1.2+200%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 2100 came in at $149, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON X600 PRO was 33.6% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 2100) vs 0.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO offers 75% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon 2100RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP
$149
$99-34%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
0.7+75%
Codename
Polaris 24
Navi 10
Release
May 13 2019
January 21 2020
Ranking
#898
#216

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.