
Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Radeon 2100
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 2100
2019Why buy it
- ✅Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌204.1% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3410
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 scores 63 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 leads by 5%. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63+5% | 60 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+12% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.3+65% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 draws 30W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+75% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 came in at $49, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3410 was 67.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers 225% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-67% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3+225% | 0.4 |
| Codename | M98 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #927 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














