Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Radeon 2100
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Popular choices:
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is positioned at rank 683 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon 2100, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 414.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+414.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and Radeon 2100
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points.
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 scores 63 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 leads by 5%. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63+5% | 60 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+12% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.3+65% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 draws 30W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+75% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers 425% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-67% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+425% | 1.2 |
| Codename | M98 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #927 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and Radeon 2100
