Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Radeon X1550
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Popular choices:
Radeon X1550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is positioned at rank #683 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2009). The Radeon X1550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3410.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 360.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+360.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and Radeon X1550
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points.
Radeon X1550
The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 scores 63 versus the Radeon X1550's 67 — the Radeon X1550 leads by 6.3%. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 512 (Radeon X1550). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63 | 67+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+38% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs Avivo (Radeon X1550). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 draws 30W versus the Radeon X1550's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 350W (Radeon X1550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+62% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon X1550 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1550) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers 350% better value. The Radeon X1550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+350% | 1.4 |
| Codename | M98 | Lexa |
| Release | January 9 2009 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #927 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and Radeon X1550
