
Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1300

Radeon 2100
Popular choices:

Radeon X1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank 725 and the Radeon X1300 is on rank 345, so the Radeon X1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and Radeon X1300

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 2100 scores 60 and the Radeon X1300 reaches 58 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60+3% | 58 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+489% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1645 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.5 MB+1054% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 has 256 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.5 MB+1054% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | Avivo |
| Decoder | Avivo | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2+100% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs 1.2 (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 offers 0% better value. The Radeon X1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #898 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















