Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1300

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon X1300

2020Core: 1327 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum

Radeon 2100
0.5 GB 50
60
+3.4%
brand logoMobility Radeon X1450
brand logoMobility Radeon X1300
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9800
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 2300
brand logoRadeon RX 560X (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
Radeon X1300
0.25 GB 100
58
0.0%
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9550
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9600
brand logoMobility Radeon X1400
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 2300
brand logoRadeon RX 560X (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    49% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon X1300

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Radeon 2100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 2100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (60 vs 58), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44% (0.6 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon 2100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

AMD

Radeon X1300

The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 2100 scores 60 and the Radeon X1300 reaches 58 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
G3D Mark Score
60+3%
58
Architecture
GCN 3.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+489%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1645 MHz+61%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
88+267%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
1.5 MB+1054%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 2100 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. Radeon 2100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 2100 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
1.5 MB+1054%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
DirectX
9.0b
9_0c
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
Encoder
Avivo
Avivo
Decoder
Avivo
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
TDP
50W-50%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
—
168mm
Height
—
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
1.2+100%
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 2100 came in at $149, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon X1300 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 2100) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 offers 50% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon 2100Radeon X1300
MSRP
$149
$100-33%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
0.6+50%
Codename
Polaris 24
Navi 14
Release
May 13 2019
May 28 2020
Ranking
#898
#336
Search Radeon 2100 on AmazonSearch Radeon X1300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.