Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON 9800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON 9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON 9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 550

2008

Why buy it

✅+10.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 193.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌243.6% higher power demand at 189W vs 55W.

RADEON 9800

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 55W instead of 189W, a 134W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (58 vs 64).
❌
166% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 10.3% in PassMark G3D (64 vs 58), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 55nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 193.5% (0.4 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON 9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 550

The Quadro FX 550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 64 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 550 scores 64 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the Quadro FX 550 leads by 10.3%. The Quadro FX 550 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 550) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 550) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800).

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score	64+10%	58
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	55 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	240	2560+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+2287%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 550 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 550) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 550 draws 189W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 109.8% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 550) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON 9800
TDP	189W	55W-71%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.3	1.1+267%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 550 came in at $150, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399. On MSRP, Quadro FX 550 was 62.4% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 550) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the Quadro FX 550 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 (2025 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON 9800
MSRP	$150-62%	$399
Performance per Dollar	0.4+300%	0.1
Codename	GT200B	Strix Halo
Release	November 11 2008	January 6 2025
Ranking	#815	#98

Search Quadro FX 550 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.