Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON 9800
Quadro FX 550
Popular choices:
RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 550 is positioned at rank 385 and the RADEON 9800 is on rank 740, so the Quadro FX 550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 550
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9800 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2008). The RADEON 9800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800.
| Insight | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $399 for the RADEON 9800, it costs 97% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 4302.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4302.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($399) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 550 and RADEON 9800
Quadro FX 550
The Quadro FX 550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 64 points. Launch price was $3,499.
RADEON 9800
The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 550 scores 64 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the Quadro FX 550 leads by 10.3%. The Quadro FX 550 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 550) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 550) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800).
| Feature | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 64+10% | 58 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2560+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+2287% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 550) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 550 draws 189W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 109.8% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 550) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 55W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 1.1+267% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 550 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399 and now averages $399. The Quadro FX 550 costs 97.5% less ($389 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.4 (Quadro FX 550) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the Quadro FX 550 offers 6300% better value. The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 550 | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-97% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.4+6300% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GT200B | Strix Halo |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #815 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 550 and RADEON 9800
