Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON 9800

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9800

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON 9800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON 9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

  • +13.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 354% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9800

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (58 vs 66).
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 299% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.8% in PassMark G3D (66 vs 58), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 354% (0.7 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9800 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON 9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

AMD

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 scores 66 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 leads by 13.8%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score
66+14%
58
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
800
2560+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+1226%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 carries 128 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4225 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON 9800
TDP
50W-9%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Perf/Watt
1.3+18%
1.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 came in at $100, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4225 was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 offers 600% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON 9800
MSRP
$100-75%
$399
Performance per Dollar
0.7+600%
0.1
Codename
Broadway
Strix Halo
Release
January 7 2010
January 6 2025
Ranking
#846
#98

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.