RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs T1200 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T1200 Mobile

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

111%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

101%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

101%

#10

T1200 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

91%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

91%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T1200 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18483.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.

Insight	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700	T1200 Mobile
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-18483.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+18483.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the T1200 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Benchmark Check

T1200 Mobile Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and T1200 Mobile

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

T1200 Mobile

The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the T1200 Mobile's 7,805 — the T1200 Mobile leads by 18483.3%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 1,024 (T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700	T1200 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	42	7,805+18483%
Architecture	RDNA 4.0	Turing
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4096+300%	1024
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+105%	1425 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700	T1200 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the T1200 Mobile has 4 GB. The T1200 Mobile offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700	T1200 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 12.1 (T1200 Mobile). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700	T1200 Mobile
DirectX	9.0	12.1+34%
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	2.0	4.6+130%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile). Decoder: VideoShader vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile).

Feature	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700	T1200 Mobile
Encoder	None	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	VideoShader	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the T1200 Mobile's 95W — a 103.8% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 350W (T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 175mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.