RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 48261.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.

InsightRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-48261.9%)
Leading raw performance (+48261.9%)
Longevity
RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 5081.6% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.

InsightRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+5081.6%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 48261.9%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 128 Tensor cores vs 152.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
42
20,312+48262%
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Ampere
Process Node
4 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096
4864+19%
Compute (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS+195%
16.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2920 MHz+75%
1665 MHz
ROPs
128+60%
80
TMUs
256+68%
152
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
64+68%
38
Tensor Cores
128
152+19%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX
9.0
12 Ultimate (12_2)+33%
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
2.0
4.6+130%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: VideoShader vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder
None
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
VideoShader
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 175mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
300W
200W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
Legacy
8-pin
Length
175mm
242mm
Height
100mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70-7%
75
Perf/Watt
0.1
101.6+101500%
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 89.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 5078.6% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$0-100%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$30-89%
$280
Performance per Dollar
1.4
72.5+5079%
Codename
Navi 48
GA104
Release
July 23 2025
December 1 2020
Ranking
#23
#73