
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 48261.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-48261.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+48261.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 5081.6% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5081.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 48261.9%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 128 Tensor cores vs 152.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42 | 20,312+48262% |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4864+19% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+195% | 16.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+75% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+60% | 80 |
| TMUs | 256+68% | 152 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64+68% | 38 |
| Tensor Cores | 128 | 152+19% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+33% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6+130% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: VideoShader vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | VideoShader | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 175mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 200W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 175mm | 242mm |
| Height | 100mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 101.6+101500% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 89.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 5078.6% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-89% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 72.5+5079% |
| Codename | Navi 48 | GA104 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #23 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















