PRO A8-8650B
VS
Core i7-2715QE

PRO A8-8650B vs Core i7-2715QE

AMD

PRO A8-8650B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-2715QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A8-8650B is positioned at rank 334 and the Core i7-2715QE is on rank 1118, so the PRO A8-8650B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A8-8650B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4825%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4559%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3311%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
997%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
790%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
691%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
396%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
391%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
356%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
356%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
352%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
342%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
337%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
336%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
333%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
100%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
100%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
99%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
99%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
98%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
97%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
97%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
95%
#309
Core i9-9900T
MSRP: $423|Avg: $215
95%
#310
Core i5-9500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $132
95%
#334
PRO A8-8650B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#344
Athlon X4 950
MSRP: $58|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2715QE

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3444%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3393%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3115%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3101%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3073%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2967%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2845%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2840%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2764%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
100%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
96%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The PRO A8-8650B delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2715QE in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPRO A8-8650BCore i7-2715QE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPRO A8-8650BCore i7-2715QE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of PRO A8-8650B and Core i7-2715QE

AMD

PRO A8-8650B

The PRO A8-8650B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,230 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The PRO A8-8650B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2715QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the PRO A8-8650B versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE — a 26.1% clock advantage for the PRO A8-8650B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The PRO A8-8650B uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2715QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A8-8650B scores 3,230 against the Core i7-2715QE's 3,221 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A8-8650B.

FeaturePRO A8-8650BCore i7-2715QE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+30%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+52%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,230
3,221
Geekbench 6 Single
587
🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A8-8650B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2715QE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePRO A8-8650BCore i7-2715QE
Socket
FM2+
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (PRO A8-8650B) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE). The Core i7-2715QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A8-8650B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeaturePRO A8-8650BCore i7-2715QE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded/Industrial