Radeon R7 A8-8650
VS
RADEON 7500

Radeon R7 A8-8650 vs RADEON 7500

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON 7500

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is positioned at rank 309 and the RADEON 7500 is on rank 384, so the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-8650

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
95%
#299
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
740%
#301
671%
#302
669%
#306
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
608%
#307
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
604%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
100%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
97%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
97%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
94%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7500

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
362700%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
348450%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
344400%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
343800%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
343100%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
341150%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
336850%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
335600%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
332500%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
331600%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
327600%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
326900%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
321000%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
320800%
#364
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
400000%
#379
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
100%
#380
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
100%
#381
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
100%
#382
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
100%
#383
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
100%
#384
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
100%
#385
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 23866.7% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7500.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
Performance
Leading raw performance (+23866.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-23866.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A8-8650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 59816.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+59816.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-8650 and RADEON 7500

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-8650

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

AMD

RADEON 7500

The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A8-8650 scores 719 versus the RADEON 7500's 3 — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 leads by 23866.7%. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON 7500 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 512 (RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
G3D Mark Score
719+23867%
3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6336 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+91%
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1183 MHz+43%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 7500 has 65 MB. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+694%
0.063 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 8.1 (RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
DirectX
12 (12_0)+48%
8.1
OpenGL
4.6+254%
1.3
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs Legacy (RADEON 7500). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs Legacy. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (RADEON 7500).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
Encoder
VCE 2.0
Legacy
Decoder
UVD 6.0
Legacy
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
MPEG-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 draws 30W versus the RADEON 7500's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 350W (RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
72
Perf/Watt
24.0+23900%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the RADEON 7500 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 0.1 (RADEON 7500) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 35900% better value. The RADEON 7500 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-8650RADEON 7500
MSRP
$49-75%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$20-60%
$50
Performance per Dollar
36.0+35900%
0.1
Codename
Opal
Lexa
Release
January 9 2014
April 20 2017
Ranking
#890
#668