
Radeon R7 A8-8650 vs GRID P4-1Q

Radeon R7 A8-8650
Popular choices:

GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is positioned at rank 309 and the GRID P4-1Q is on rank 413, so the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-8650
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-8650.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A8-8650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $185), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 811.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+811.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($185) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-8650 and GRID P4-1Q

Radeon R7 A8-8650
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 scores 719 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 719 | 730+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+662% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1178 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 768 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 draws 30W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-87% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.0+650% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890 and now averages $185. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 costs 89.2% less ($165 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) vs 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 823.1% better value. The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-8650 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-99% | $5890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-89% | $185 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.0+823% | 3.9 |
| Codename | Opal | GM204 |
| Release | January 9 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #890 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














