Processor 300T
VS
Core i7-4900MQ

Processor 300T vs Core i7-4900MQ

Intel

Processor 300T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core i7-4900MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor 300T

#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
107%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
107%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
106%
#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
106%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
106%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
105%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
105%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
53%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
104%
#257
Core i9-14900
MSRP: $524|Avg: $589
104%
#258
Core i5-8600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $130
103%
#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
103%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
103%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
102%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
101%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
51%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
101%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
100%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
100%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
100%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
99%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
99%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
99%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
98%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
98%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
97%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
97%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
44%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
96%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4900MQ

#1046
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2722%
#1047
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2682%
#1048
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2462%
#1049
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2451%
#1050
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2428%
#1052
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2345%
#1053
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2249%
#1054
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2245%
#1055
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2185%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
100%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
99%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
98%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
97%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Processor 300T (2024) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightProcessor 300TCore i7-4900MQ
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($82)
More affordable ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4900MQ (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightProcessor 300TCore i7-4900MQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+107%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($82)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor 300T and Core i7-4900MQ

Intel

Processor 300T

The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

Intel

Core i7-4900MQ

The Core i7-4900MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,146 points. Launch price was $568.

Processing Power

The Processor 300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4900MQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-4900MQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4900MQ — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4900MQ (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-4900MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300T scores 6,084 against the Core i7-4900MQ's 6,146 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4900MQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4900MQ.

FeatureProcessor 300TCore i7-4900MQ
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+21%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
6,084
6,146+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor 300T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-4900MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureProcessor 300TCore i7-4900MQ
Socket
LGA1700
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Processor 300T launched at $82 MSRP, while the Core i7-4900MQ debuted at $570. At current prices ($82 vs $40), the Core i7-4900MQ is $42 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor 300T delivers 74.2 pts/$ vs 153.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-4900MQ — making the Core i7-4900MQ the 69.7% better value option.

FeatureProcessor 300TCore i7-4900MQ
MSRP
$82-86%
$570
Avg Price (30d)
$82
$40-51%
Performance per Dollar
74.2
153.7+107%
Release Date
2024
2013