Quadro 1000M vs Radeon HD 6570

NVIDIA

Quadro 1000M

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1072 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6570

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon HD 6570 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon HD 6570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon HD 6570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 1000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 40W instead of 250W, a 210W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6570

2010

Why buy it

  • 29.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 525% higher power demand at 250W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (556 vs 555), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 1000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 1000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon HD 6570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 1000M

The Quadro 1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $200.89.

AMD

Radeon HD 6570

The Radeon HD 6570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 1000M scores 555 and the Radeon HD 6570 reaches 556 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 1000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6570 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 1000M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6570). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro 1000M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6570). Boost clocks: 1072 MHz vs 880 MHz.

FeatureQuadro 1000MRadeon HD 6570
G3D Mark Score
555
556
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
1536+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.017 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+166%
Boost Clock
1072 MHz+22%
880 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
96+200%
L1 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 1000MRadeon HD 6570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 1000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6570 carries 1 GB. Quadro 1000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 1000M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6570. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro 1000M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6570) — the Quadro 1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 1000MRadeon HD 6570
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 1000M draws 40W versus the Radeon HD 6570's 250W — a 144.8% difference. The Quadro 1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 1000M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro 1000MRadeon HD 6570
TDP
40W-84%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
13.9+532%
2.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 1000M (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro 1000MRadeon HD 6570
MSRP
$79
Codename
GM107
Cayman
Release
August 18 2015
December 14 2010
Ranking
#594
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.