Quadro 1000M vs Radeon R5 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon R5 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon R5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 1000M

2015

Why buy it

✅42.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 1000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 240 instead at 558 vs 555, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 1000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 1000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 1000M vs Radeon R5 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 1000M

The Quadro 1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $200.89.

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 1000M scores 555 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 1000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 1000M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro 1000M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240). Boost clocks: 1072 MHz vs 780 MHz.

Feature	Quadro 1000M	Radeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score	555	558
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+60%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.017 TFLOPS+127%	0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1072 MHz+37%	780 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+60%	20
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 1000M	Radeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 1000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro 1000M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 240) — the Quadro 1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 1000M	Radeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 1000M draws 40W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 1000M) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 1000M	Radeon R5 240
TDP	40W	30W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	13.9	18.6+34%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 1000M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 1000M	Radeon R5 240
MSRP	—	$59
Codename	GM107	Oland
Release	August 18 2015	October 8 2013
Ranking	#594	#911

Search Quadro 1000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.