Quadro 1000M vs Radeon R5 240
Quadro 1000M
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 1000M is positioned at rank 199 and the Radeon R5 240 is on rank 135, so the Radeon R5 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 1000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 1000M.
| Insight | Quadro 1000M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R5 240 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 1000M and Radeon R5 240
Quadro 1000M
The Quadro 1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $200.89.
Radeon R5 240
The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 1000M scores 555 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 1000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 1000M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro 1000M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240). Boost clocks: 1072 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 555 | 558 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+60% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.017 TFLOPS+127% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz+37% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+60% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+220% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro 1000M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 240) — the Quadro 1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 1000M draws 40W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 1000M) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 30W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.9 | 18.6+34% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 1000M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $59 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GM107 | Oland |
| Release | August 18 2015 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #594 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 1000M and Radeon R5 240
