Quadro FX 1800
VS
Radeon HD 8650D

Quadro FX 1800 vs Radeon HD 8650D

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650D

2012Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1800 is positioned at rank 364 and the Radeon HD 8650D is on rank 295, so the Radeon HD 8650D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800

#349
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18238%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
100%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
99%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
99%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
98%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
96%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
96%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
88%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
84%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
81%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
80%
#374
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
75%
#375
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
75%
#376
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
75%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
74%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
72%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650D

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2748%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2640%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2609%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2605%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2599%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2584%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2552%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2542%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2519%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2512%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2482%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2477%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2432%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2430%
#280
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3030%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
96%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
95%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
91%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
90%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
89%
#304
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
89%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
86%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
85%
#309
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8650D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 1800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 1800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 1800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 49.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+49.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1800 and Radeon HD 8650D

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800

The Quadro FX 1800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650D

The Radeon HD 8650D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 396 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1800 scores 395 and the Radeon HD 8650D reaches 396 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8650D uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1800) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650D). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650D).

FeatureQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
G3D Mark Score
395
396
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1024+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+183%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+25%
64
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1800 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650D has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 1800 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8650D) — the Radeon HD 8650D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
VRAM Capacity
0.75 GB+50%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8650D's 130W — a 37% difference. The Radeon HD 8650D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
TDP
189W
130W-31%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
2.1
3.0+43%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 1800 launched at $489 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon HD 8650D launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Quadro FX 1800 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.0 (Quadro FX 1800) vs 2.6 (Radeon HD 8650D) — the Quadro FX 1800 offers 53.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8650D is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 1800Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP
$489
$150-69%
Avg Price (30d)
$100-33%
$150
Performance per Dollar
4.0+54%
2.6
Codename
GT200B
Pitcairn
Release
November 11 2008
March 5 2012
Ranking
#815
#503