Quadro FX 1800 vs Quadro FX 4600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1800 vs Quadro FX 4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1800 vs Quadro FX 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1800

2008

Why buy it

✅11.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,510 less on MSRP ($489 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 300.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($489 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.

Quadro FX 4600

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
308.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$489 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $489 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 4600 instead at 403 vs 395, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,510 cheaper on MSRP at $489 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 300.7% (0.8 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 1800 vs Quadro FX 4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1800

The Quadro FX 1800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1800 scores 395 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1800) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600).

Feature	Quadro FX 1800	Quadro FX 4600
G3D Mark Score	395	403+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240+25%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+35%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	80+25%	64
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1800	Quadro FX 4600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 768 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1800 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4600. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1800) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) — the Quadro FX 1800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1800	Quadro FX 4600
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	0.75 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1800 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 23% difference. The Quadro FX 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1800) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 1800	Quadro FX 4600
TDP	189W	150W-21%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	2.1	2.7+29%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1800 came in at $489, while the Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999. On MSRP, Quadro FX 1800 was 75.5% cheaper ($1510 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (Quadro FX 1800) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4600) — the Quadro FX 1800 offers 300% better value.

Feature	Quadro FX 1800	Quadro FX 4600
MSRP	$489-76%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	0.8+300%	0.2
Codename	GT200B	GT200B
Release	November 11 2008	November 11 2008
Ranking	#815	#884

Search Quadro FX 1800 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.