Quadro FX 1800 vs GeForce 7900 GTX
Quadro FX 1800
Popular choices:
GeForce 7900 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1800 is positioned at rank 364 and the GeForce 7900 GTX is on rank 711, so the Quadro FX 1800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (768 MB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7900 GTX.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7900 GTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 7900 GTX holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $100), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 145.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1800 and GeForce 7900 GTX
Quadro FX 1800
The Quadro FX 1800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 7900 GTX
The GeForce 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1800 scores 395 and the GeForce 7900 GTX reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 7900 GTX uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1800) vs 224 (GeForce 7900 GTX).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 395+2% | 388 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1800 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7900 GTX has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 1800 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB+50% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1800 draws 189W versus the GeForce 7900 GTX's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 7900 GTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1800) vs 350W (GeForce 7900 GTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1 | 2.6+24% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1800 launched at $489 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce 7900 GTX launched at $499 and now averages $40. The GeForce 7900 GTX costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.0 (Quadro FX 1800) vs 9.7 (GeForce 7900 GTX) — the GeForce 7900 GTX offers 142.5% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800 | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $489-2% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $40-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0 | 9.7+142% |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #815 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1800 and GeForce 7900 GTX
