Quadro FX 2000 vs GeForce FX Go5650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2000 is positioned at rank 426 and the GeForce FX Go5650 is on rank 334, so the GeForce FX Go5650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2000

#411

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1477300%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

100%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5650

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

8534%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

8199%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

8104%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

8089%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

8073%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

8027%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

7926%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

7896%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

7824%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

7802%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

7708%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

7692%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

7553%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

7548%

#318

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

9412%

#333

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

100%

#334

GeForce FX Go5650

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#335

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

100%

#336

Radeon HD 8350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $39

96%

#338

Radeon X1950 GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $49

89%

#339

GeForce 6600 GT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

85%

#340

RADEON X600 PRO

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

80%

#341

Radeon X1600 Pro

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

78%

#342

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

74%

#344

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

68%

#345

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

68%

#346

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

68%

#347

Radeon X1800 GTO

MSRP: $249|Avg: $20

67%

#348

GeForce 7800 GT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $20

64%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX Go5650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 2000	GeForce FX Go5650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 2000 Benchmark Check

GeForce FX Go5650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2000 and GeForce FX Go5650

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce FX Go5650

The GeForce FX Go5650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 2000 scores 18 versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 17 — the Quadro FX 2000 leads by 5.9%. The Quadro FX 2000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce FX Go5650 uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 2000) vs 336 (GeForce FX Go5650). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5650).

Feature	Quadro FX 2000	GeForce FX Go5650
G3D Mark Score	18+6%	17
Architecture	Fermi	Rankine
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	336+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	1.089 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	256 KB	448 KB+75%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 2000	GeForce FX Go5650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 2000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go5650 has 512 MB. The GeForce FX Go5650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2000) vs 512 KB (GeForce FX Go5650) — the GeForce FX Go5650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 2000	GeForce FX Go5650
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2000 draws 62W versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 150W — a 83% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2000) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.