Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Quadro FX 2000 vs RADEON A9800XT

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON A9800XT

2015Boost: 970 MHz
Similar parts
·····
Buy on Amazon

Quadro FX 2000 vs RADEON A9800XT Performance Spectrum

Quadro FX 2000
0.125 GB 62
18
0.0%
brand logoGeForce FX 5600XT
brand logoGeForce FX 5200SE
brand logoGeForce FX Go5300
brand logoGeForce Go 6200
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
RADEON A9800XT
0.5 GB 250
23
+27.8%
brand logoRADEON 7500
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9000
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 7500
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 2000 vs RADEON A9800XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Quadro FX 2000
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON A9800XT
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Quadro FX 2000 vs RADEON A9800XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 2000

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 62W instead of 250W, a 188W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (18 vs 23).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON A9800XT

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅+27.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ❌303.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON A9800XT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 27.8% in PassMark G3D (23 vs 18), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RADEON A9800XT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 2000 vs RADEON A9800XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

RADEON A9800XT

The RADEON A9800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 2000 scores 18 versus the RADEON A9800XT's 23 — the RADEON A9800XT leads by 27.8%. The Quadro FX 2000 is built on Fermi while the RADEON A9800XT uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 2000) vs 2,048 (RADEON A9800XT). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (RADEON A9800XT).

FeatureQuadro FX 2000RADEON A9800XT
G3D Mark Score
18
23+28%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
2048+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
3.973 TFLOPS+728%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 2000RADEON A9800XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 2000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON A9800XT carries 512 MB. RADEON A9800XT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000 and 64-bit on the RADEON A9800XT. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2000) vs 512 KB (RADEON A9800XT) — the RADEON A9800XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 2000RADEON A9800XT
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2000 draws 62W versus the RADEON A9800XT's 250W — a 120.5% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2000) vs 350W (RADEON A9800XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureQuadro FX 2000RADEON A9800XT
TDP
62W-75%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
—
220mm
Slots
—
1
Perf/Watt
0.3+200%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 2000 came in at $3000, while the RADEON A9800XT launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON A9800XT was 100+% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) vs Infinity (RADEON A9800XT) — the RADEON A9800XT offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON A9800XT (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro FX 2000RADEON A9800XT
MSRP
$3000
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
Infinity
Codename
GF106
Antigua
Release
December 24 2010
November 19 2015
Ranking
#902
#394
Search Quadro FX 2000 on AmazonSearch RADEON A9800XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.