Quadro FX 2700 vs GRID K180Q
Quadro FX 2700
Popular choices:
GRID K180Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2700 is positioned at rank 203 and the GRID K180Q is on rank 381, so the Quadro FX 2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700
Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 2700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K180Q.
| Insight | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 2700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 2700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $1,000), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1933.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1933.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2700 and GRID K180Q
Quadro FX 2700
The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GRID K180Q
The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 2700 scores 543 and the GRID K180Q reaches 534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GRID K180Q uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2700) vs 1,536 (GRID K180Q). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 543+2% | 534 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1536+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+268% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 2700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K180Q has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 2700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700) vs 512 KB (GRID K180Q) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 2700 draws 189W versus the GRID K180Q's 225W — a 17.4% difference. The Quadro FX 2700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2700) vs 350W (GRID K180Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-16% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9+21% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID K180Q launched at $1000 and now averages $1000. The Quadro FX 2700 costs 95% less ($950 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (Quadro FX 2700) vs 0.5 (GRID K180Q) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 2080% better value. The GRID K180Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700 | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-90% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-95% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9+2080% | 0.5 |
| Codename | GT200B | GK104 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #595 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 2700 and GRID K180Q
