Quadro FX 2700
VS
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

Quadro FX 2700 vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2700

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2700 is positioned at rank 203 and the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is on rank 549, so the Quadro FX 2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700

#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
99%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
98%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
94%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
92%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
90%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
90%
#188
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2721%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
98%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
97%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#210
GRID K240Q
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
94%
#211
FirePro M4150
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
93%
#212
FirePro V4900
MSRP: $200|Avg: $47
93%
#213
GRID K160Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
92%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
92%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

#538
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2983%
#540
2704%
#541
2697%
#545
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2452%
#546
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2435%
#548
100%
#549
100%
#550
100%
#551
100%
#552
Radeon R5 M255
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#553
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
98%
#554
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#555
97%
#557
95%
#558
Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#559
93%
#560
93%
#561
92%
#562
GeForce 9200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
#563
Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 2700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 2700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 2700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 198.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+198.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2700 and Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 546 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 2700 scores 543 and the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual reaches 546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2700) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual).

FeatureQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
G3D Mark Score
543
546
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
640+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 2700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 2700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2700 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
TDP
189W
50W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
2.9
10.9+276%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Quadro FX 2700 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (Quadro FX 2700) vs 3.6 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 202.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 2700Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual
MSRP
$100-33%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$50-67%
$150
Performance per Dollar
10.9+203%
3.6
Codename
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
August 1 2013
Ranking
#815
#863