Quadro FX 2700 vs Radeon R5 M335

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 2700 vs Radeon R5 M335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 2700 vs Radeon R5 M335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅55.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 48.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M335

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 2700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 2700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 55.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M335 instead at 549 vs 543, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 2700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 2700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 48.4% (5.4 vs 3.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 2700 vs Radeon R5 M335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 2700 scores 543 and the Radeon R5 M335 reaches 549 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M335 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2700) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M335). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335).

Feature	Quadro FX 2700	Radeon R5 M335
G3D Mark Score	543	549+1%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	320+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6592 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+300%	20
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 2700	Radeon R5 M335
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M335. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) — the Quadro FX 2700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 2700	Radeon R5 M335
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2700 draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 M335's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R5 M335 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2700) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M335). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro FX 2700	Radeon R5 M335
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	2.9	7.3+152%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 2700 came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150. On MSRP, Quadro FX 2700 was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Quadro FX 2700) vs 3.7 (Radeon R5 M335) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 45.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M335 (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 2700	Radeon R5 M335
MSRP	$100-33%	$150
Performance per Dollar	5.4+46%	3.7
Codename	GT200B	Jet
Release	November 11 2008	May 15 2016
Ranking	#815	#922

Search Quadro FX 2700 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.