Quadro FX 2700M vs Intel UHD Graphics 605
Quadro FX 2700M
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 2700M is positioned at rank #237 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Intel UHD Graphics 605 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 2700M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 2700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 605.
| Insight | Quadro FX 2700M | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2700M and Intel UHD Graphics 605
Quadro FX 2700M
The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Intel UHD Graphics 605
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 2700M scores 367 and the Intel UHD Graphics 605 reaches 364 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 uses Generation 9.5, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700M | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 367 | 364 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 240+30% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+47% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 80+248% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700M | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 2700M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB. The Quadro FX 2700M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700M | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 2700M draws 189W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 15W — a 170.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700M | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 24.3+1179% |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2700M | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GT200B | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #815 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 2700M and Intel UHD Graphics 605
