Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon HD4670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon HD4670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon HD4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 2700M

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 250W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Radeon HD4670

2010

Why buy it

✅8.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌32.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD4670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 2700M instead at 367 vs 366, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 2700M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD4670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD4670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 2700M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon HD4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 2700M

The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD4670

The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 2700M scores 367 and the Radeon HD4670 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD4670). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670).

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon HD4670
G3D Mark Score	367	366
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1536+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+334%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	96+20%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon HD4670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4670. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD4670) — the Radeon HD4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon HD4670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD4670's 250W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 2700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 300W (Radeon HD4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon HD4670
TDP	189W-24%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	1.9+27%	1.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD4670 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon HD4670
MSRP	—	$67
Codename	GT200B	Cayman
Release	November 11 2008	December 14 2010
Ranking	#815	#596

Search Quadro FX 2700M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD4670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.