Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 2700M
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 2700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Intel UHD Graphics 605 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 2700M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 2700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 605.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and Quadro FX 2700M
Intel UHD Graphics 605
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.
Quadro FX 2700M
The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 scores 364 and the Quadro FX 2700M reaches 367 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro FX 2700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700M). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 364 | 367 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 240+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 23 | 80+248% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 2700M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 draws 15W versus the Quadro FX 2700M's 189W — a 170.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3+1179% | 1.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | GT200B |
| Release | October 1 2017 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #824 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 605 and Quadro FX 2700M
