Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon HD4670
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Popular choices:
Radeon HD4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Intel UHD Graphics 605 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD4670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 605.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD4670 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and Radeon HD4670
Intel UHD Graphics 605
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.
Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 scores 364 and the Radeon HD4670 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD4670). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 364 | 366 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 1536+735% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+539% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+31% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 23 | 96+317% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4670 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD4670 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD4670's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 300W (Radeon HD4670). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3+1520% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon HD4670 launched at $67 and now averages $15. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 24.4 (Radeon HD4670) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $67 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 24.4 |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | Cayman |
| Release | October 1 2017 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #824 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 605 and Radeon HD4670
