Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon HD4670

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
VS
AMD

Radeon HD4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon HD4670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon HD4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Radeon HD4670

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 605 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD4670 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD4670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (366 vs 364), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD4670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD4670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon HD4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

AMD

Radeon HD4670

The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 scores 364 and the Radeon HD4670 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD4670). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 880 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon HD4670
G3D Mark Score
364
366
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TeraScale 3
Process Node
14 nm+++
40 nm
Shading Units
184
1536+735%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4232 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+539%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+31%
880 MHz
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
23
96+317%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon HD4670
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4670 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD4670 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 605 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4670.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon HD4670
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD4670's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 300W (Radeon HD4670). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon HD4670
TDP
15W-94%
250W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
24.3+1520%
1.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 605 was 100+% cheaper ($67 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD4670) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 605 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon HD4670
MSRP
$0-100%
$67
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
5.5
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
Cayman
Release
October 1 2017
December 14 2010
Ranking
#824
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.