Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 189W, a 174W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).

Quadro FX 3700

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 605 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 3700 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1160% higher power demand at 189W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (372 vs 364), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 scores 364 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Quadro FX 3700
G3D Mark Score
364
372+2%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
55 nm
Shading Units
184
240+30%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4232 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+47%
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
23
80+248%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Quadro FX 3700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3700 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 605 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Quadro FX 3700
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Quadro FX 3700
DirectX
12 (12_1)+20%
10_0
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 draws 15W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 170.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Quadro FX 3700
TDP
15W-92%
189W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
24.3+1115%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 605 was 100+% cheaper ($1599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3700) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 605 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Quadro FX 3700
MSRP
$0-100%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.2
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
GT200B
Release
October 1 2017
November 11 2008
Ranking
#824
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.