
Intel UHD Graphics 605

Quadro FX 3700
Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel UHD Graphics 605
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 189W, a 174W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
Quadro FX 3700
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 605 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 3700 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1160% higher power demand at 189W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 3700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 605
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 scores 364 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 364 | 372+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 240+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 23 | 80+248% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3700 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 605 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+20% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 draws 15W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 170.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3+1115% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 605 was 100+% cheaper ($1599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3700) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 605 (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.2 |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | GT200B |
| Release | October 1 2017 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #824 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















