GeForce GT 625 vs Quadro FX 2700M
GeForce GT 625
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 2700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 625 is positioned at rank 195 and the Quadro FX 2700M is on rank 237, so the GeForce GT 625 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 625 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 2700M.
| Insight | GeForce GT 625 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 625 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625 and Quadro FX 2700M
GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.
Quadro FX 2700M
The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the Quadro FX 2700M reaches 367 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 2700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700M). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 375+2% | 367 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 352+47% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+38% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 80+82% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 625 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 625 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 625) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700M) — the GeForce GT 625 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the Quadro FX 2700M's 189W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 2700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 189W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 1.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 625 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | GF100 | GT200B |
| Release | May 31 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #618 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 625 and Quadro FX 2700M
